Media personality Daddy Freeze has weighed in on the controversy surrounding a luxury Hermès handbag reportedly carried by Margaret Obi, wife of Nigeria Democratic Congress presidential candidate Peter Obi.
Daddy Freeze said he had no issue with Margaret Obi owning or carrying an expensive handbag, noting that Peter Obi was already a wealthy businessman before entering government.
His criticism, however, focused on the contrast he perceives between Peter Obi’s public image of personal frugalityand luxury items associated with people around him.
The controversy began after photographs of Margaret Obi carrying a Hermès handbag circulated online, with reports attaching a value of between ₦237 million and ₦250 million to the item. However, reports have noted that the exact value of the particular bag in the photograph has not been independently established.
Speaking in a video, Daddy Freeze said his concern was not about the couple’s wealth but whether the luxury item was consistent with the image of prudence associated with Peter Obi.
“I have no problem with Peter Obi’s wife carrying a luxury bag; her husband is a billionaire. He was before he came into government.”
Daddy Freeze then questioned Obi’s public statements about his personal lifestyle, particularly his claims about owning limited personal items.
“The only problem I have with him is he says he only has one shoe and one watch, but when you put yourself in a certain light, and things around you don’t seem to add to that light, there is a problem.”
He also questioned whether people close to the former Anambra State governor maintained the same level of financial restraint.
“He (Peter Obi) is honest and humble, but are people around him as prudent as he is?”
Daddy Freeze argued that if a politician builds part of his public identity around prudence, expensive luxury items associated with his household could naturally attract scrutiny.
“If you market yourself as extremely prudent, I promise you a 250 million Naira Hermès bag is not a sign of being prudent.”
He described his concern as one involving “double standards, hypocrisy and selective morality”, and questioned how supporters might react if a similar luxury item were associated with another prominent political family.
“Imagine if na Remi Tinubu that was carrying a bag of 250 million Naira wetin Una go talk?”
The controversy has since generated competing views online. Critics have questioned whether the reported value of the handbag fits with Obi’s public image of prudence, while supporters have argued that his wife’s personal possessions should not automatically be linked to government funds or his management of public resources.
Peter Obi has also addressed the controversy, saying his wife has her own business and income and that he does not determine the cost of the bags and shoes she buys.
“I have no problem with Peter Obi’s wife carrying a luxury bag; her husband is a billionaire. He was before he came into government. The only problem I have with him is he says he only has one shoe and one watch, but when you put yourself in a certain light, and things around you… pic.twitter.com/DmZgg4s7oL
— YabaLeftOnline (@yabaleftonline) September 14, 2026
The debate therefore remains centred on personal wealth, family lifestyle and political messaging, rather than any established evidence that public funds were used to purchase the handbag.
How did this story make you feel?
Join the conversation
Share a thoughtful response. Submissions may be reviewed before appearing.
